Wednesday, January 18, 2017

15 american police brutality Videos List Top 10

Trump sued for defamation by former Apprentice Summer Zervos

A former Apprentice contestant who accuses US President-elect Donald Trump of sexual assault has filed a defamation lawsuit against him.

Summer Zervos, who alleges Mr Trump forced himself on her in 2007, said he lied to the nation about his behaviour.
The lawsuit, which Ms Zervos announced at a news conference, alleges Mr Trump is a "liar and misogynist" who "debased and denigrated" her.
The news came just three days before Mr Trump is sworn in as president.
Mr Trump faced a spate of sexual misconduct allegations in the run up to the election, all of which he has denied.
At the time, he dismissed them as "false and ridiculous" and said they were "sick" and driven by fame, money or politics.
"Since Mr Trump has not issued a retraction, as I requested, he has therefore left me with no alternative but to sue him in order to vindicate my reputation," Ms Zervos told journalists in Los Angeles on Tuesday.
She was joined by her lawyer, Gloria Allred, a Democratic party activist, who said the plaintiff's allegations had passed a lie detector test.

'Thrown under the bus'

Ms Zervos is one of several women who came forward to accuse the incoming 45th president of sexual assault after the October release of a 2005 videotape in which he is heard making lewd comments about groping women.
The 41-year-old former reality show contestant said Mr Trump had sexually assaulted her during a meeting to discuss job opportunities at a Beverly Hills hotel.
She said he "began thrusting his genitals" as she fended off his advances.
Summer Zervos (L), with her lawyer Gloria Allred, said she was launching the lawsuit to Image copyrightEPA
Image captionMs Zervos is among several women who have accused Mr Trump of sexual assault, allegations denied by the president-elect
Mr Trump, a Republican, has not filed a lawsuit against any of the women, despite an earlier threat to sue the accusers.
Ms Zervos' lawsuit alleges that the president-elect defamed her by denying her account and accusing her and other women of fabricating sexual assault claims.
She asked Mr Trump to retract his words late last year, but he declined to do so.
Ms Allred said Mr Trump "knowingly, intentionally and maliciously threw each of these women under the bus" and that repeatedly calling them "liars" in public caused distress.
Ms Zervos added that she would be willing to rescind the lawsuit if the president-elect retracts the statements he made and acknowledges his behaviour towards her.
Following her allegations, the Trump campaign released a statement from someone it identified as Ms Zervos' first cousin.
John Barry wrote that he was "shocked and bewildered" by her allegations, insisting Ms Zervos had only previously said "glowing" things about Mr Trump.

Chelsea Manning: Obama reduces sentence of Wikileaks source


Chelsea Manning

US President Barack Obama has commuted Chelsea Manning's sentence for leaking documents to Wikileaks in 2010.
The 29-year-old transgender US Army private, born Bradley Manning, will be freed on 17 May instead of her scheduled 2045 release.

She was sentenced to 35 years in 2013 for her role in leaking diplomatic cables to the anti-secrecy group.
The leak was one of the largest breaches of classified material in US history.
The commutation reduces Manning's sentence but is not a pardon, which some campaigners had called for.
Manning's uncle, Kevin Fox, referring to Chelsea as a man, told the BBC the family was "over the moon".
"It's sooner than we expected - we didn't expect his case even to be looked at for another three or four years," Mr Fox said.
Manning lived for four years as a teenager in Wales. Her Welsh family said in a statement that they were "overjoyed", adding that there would "always be a welcome for her here in Wales".
Manning twice attempted suicide last year at the male military prison where she is being held at Fort Leavenworth, Kansas.
She also went on a hunger strike last year, which she ended after the military agreed to provide her with gender transition treatment.
Chelsea Manning at Fort Meade, Maryland, in July 2013Image copyrightREUTERS
Image captionChelsea Manning, then Bradley, was convicted in 2013
Mr Obama granted commutation of sentences to 209 individuals and pardons to 64 others, in one of his final acts as president.
Edward Snowden, a former National Security Agency (NSA) contractor who leaked information on mass surveillance programmes before fleeing the US, was not granted a pardon.
Russian authorities said on Wednesday that Mr Snowden had been granted a two-year extension to his temporary asylum in the country.

What's the reaction?

Manning's lawyer, David Coombs, told the BBC the decision would be a great relief to his client.
"It really is a great act of mercy by President Obama," said Mr Coombs.
Journalist Glenn Greenwald, who broke the story of Edward Snowden's leaks, told the BBC: "I don't think she (Manning) should have spent a single day in prison."
He said she was "heroic and has inspired millions of people around the world".
Media captionJournalist Glenn Greenwald: Chelsea Manning and Edward Snowden "acted with extreme amounts of courage"
Writing on Twitter, Mr Snowden said: "Let it be said here in earnest, with good heart: Thanks, Obama."
But Republican Senator John McCain said the decision was "a grave mistake that I fear will encourage further acts of espionage".
And House Speaker Paul Ryan, also a Republican, called it "outrageous".

What was in the leaked cables?

The US Army charged Manning with 22 counts relating to the unauthorised possession and distribution of more than 700,000 secret diplomatic and military documents and video.
Included in those files was video footage of an Apache helicopter killing 12 civilians in Baghdad in 2007.
Still
Image captionLeaked footage showed a US helicopter pilot killing civilians and journalists
Manning also passed on sensitive messages between US diplomats, intelligence assessments of Guantanamo detainees being held without trial and military records from the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan.
The disclosures were considered an embarrassment to the US, prompting the Obama administration to crack down on government leaks.
At a sentencing hearing, Manning apologised for "hurting the US" and said she had thought she could "change the world for the better".

More on commuted sentences


What next for Julian Assange?

Wikileaks, which published the diplomatic cables, previously said its founder Julian Assange would agree to be extradited to the US if Mr Obama granted clemency to Manning.
The White House said Manning's commutation had not been influenced in any way by Mr Assange's offer, and the US justice department has not indicted Mr Assange nor publicly sought his extradition.
He is wanted for questioning by Swedish authorities in relation to an alleged sex offence.
Mr Assange, who has taken refuge in the Ecuadorian embassy in London since 2012, did not immediately comment on whether he plans to surrender.
But he did tweet: "Thank you to everyone who campaigned for Chelsea Manning's clemency. Your courage and determination made the impossible possible."

Why no pardon for Edward Snowden?

More than a million supporters of Mr Snowden have petitioned Mr Obama to pardon Mr Snowden, who also leaked classified US documents.
But according to the White House, the National Security Agency (NSA) leaker has not himself submitted the necessary documents.
An undated photo made available by the Right Livelihood Award organisation in Stockholm, Sweden 24 September 2014 of fugitive US intelligence contractor Edward SnowdenImage copyrightEPA
Image captionMr Snowden has been living in Russia since 2013
The White House last week pointed out that Manning had passed through the US military justice system and acknowledged her crimes.
Mr Snowden, however, fled the US in 2013, evading charges in America which could put him in prison for up to 30 years. He now lives in Russia.
White House spokesman Josh Earnest said "the disclosures by Edward Snowden were far more serious and far more dangerous" and accused him of fleeing "into the arms of an adversary".

How do pardons and commutations work?

Mr Obama has commuted 1,385 sentences and issued 212 pardons, more than the total granted by the past 12 presidents combined.
In America, a pardon not only lifts the sentence but removes other penalties such as the bar on convicted felons sitting on federal juries, and state-level prohibitions on such things as voting or possession of firearms.
A commutation means the sentence is lifted but the civil handicaps outlined above remain.
Neither a pardon nor a commutation is an acknowledgment of innocence.

Salman Khan acquitted of Arms Act violations in 1998 case


JODHPUR: Bollywood actor Salman Khan was today acquitted of all charges in the Arms Act case against him in the alleged poaching of two black bucks.

"Salman Khan (has been) acquitted in the Arms Act case after the prosecution failed to provide conclusive evidence," the film star's lawyer said, ANI reported.

A case against the film star was registered in October 1998 under the Arms Act for his alleged use and possession of arms with an expired license during the alleged poaching of two black bucks in Kankani village.

Salman's 0.22 rifle and 0.32 revolver had expired licenses and cases were filed under Sections 3/25 and 3/27. The maximum sentence in Section 3/25 is usually three years while Section 3/27 has seven years as the maximum sentence.

The film star was present in the court of Chief Judicial Magistrate (Jodhpur district), where the verdict was pronounced. He arrived in Jodhpur yesterday with his sister Alveera and his advocates.

Hailing the decision defense counsel H M Saraswat said "the court admitted our arguments that Khan was framed in this case as he had no concrete evidence against him."

On the other hand, the prosecution counsel BS Bhati said they would appeal against the acquittal in the sessions court.

According to the prosecution counsel Bhawani Singh Bhati, the arguments in the case were completed on January 9 in the trial court and the order had been reserved by the magistrate to be pronounced today.


During the arguments, while the defence had argued that there was no evidence against Salman in the case and he was framed by the forest department, the prosecution argued that there were adequate evidence against the film star for the use and possession of the arms with an expired license.

Salman Khan acquitted in Arms Act case

The court gave Khan the ‘benefit of doubt’ while exonerating him.

Hindi actor Salman Khan was on Wednesday acquitted in a case registered against him under the Arms Act in Jodhpur in 1998 along with the cases of poaching of chinkaras and black bucks, when he was shooting for Hindi film Hum Saath Saath Hain.

Jodhpur Chief Judicial Magistrate Dalpat Singh Rajpurohit exonerated Mr. Khan in the matter, while holding that the prosecution had failed to produce evidence and witnesses to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt.
The police and the Forest Department had claimed that Mr. Khan was in possession of illegal arms, with expired licences, which he had used to hunt two black bucks on October 1 and 2, 1998, in Kankani village on the outskirts of Jodhpur.
The Magistrate pronounced his order holding Mr. Khan not guilty in the court where the actor along with his sister Alveera was present. A huge crowd of fans, who had gathered outside the court building, cheered the verdict which gave benefit of doubt to Mr. Khan.
The defence lawyers, who had pleaded that Mr. Khan was innocent and had been framed in the case, said justice had been rendered by the court. Mr. Khan was acquitted in two cases of poaching of chinkaras in July last year, but he still faces trial in the Kankani village issue, which is yet to be concluded.
The case under the Arms Act is one of the four cases against the actor. While the Rajasthan High Court has acquitted him in two cases of poaching of chinkara, trial in the third case of alleged poaching of two blackbucks is on.
Elaborate security arrangements were made in the court premises in view of Salman’s appearance with nearly 150 policemen deployed.
A large number of the actor’s fans were also present near the court premises.

Top 10 SCARIEST Clown Sightings Caught on Video Scary Clown Videos

Tuesday, January 17, 2017

आर्म्स ऐक्ट केस: जोधपुर में सलमान, शिकार मामले में आज कोर्ट सुना सकता है फैसला

salman

जोधपुर (राजस्थान)
बॉलिवुड ऐक्टर सलमान खान के लिए आज फैसले का दिन है। जोधपुर की एक अदालत सलमान खान के खिलाफ दर्ज आर्म्स ऐक्ट के एक मामले में आज अपना फैसला सुना सकती है। सलमान के खिलाफ दर्ज चार मामलों से यह एक है। आर्म्स ऐक्ट के इस मामले में अदालत सलमान को 3 से 7 साल की साज सुना सकती है। कानूनी जानकारों के मुताबिक अगर अदालत सलमान को तीन साल से ज्यादा की सजा सुनाती है, तो उन्हें तुरंत जेल जाना होगा। लेकिन अगर उन्हें तीन साल से कम की सजा होती है, तो उन्हें ऊपरी अदालत में अपील का समय मिल जाएगा।

सलमान के खिलाफ शिकार से जुड़े तीन मामले दर्ज हैं। चिंकारा के शिकार से जुड़े दो मामलों में राजस्थान हाई कोर्ट सलमान को बरी कर चुका है। वहीं, दो काले हिरण के शिकार के मामले में तीसरा केस चल रहा है।

सलमान फिलहाल कबीर खान की फिल्म 'ट्यूबलाइट' में काम कर रहे हैं। वह अपनी बहन अलवीरा के साथ मंगलवार शाम जोधपुर पहुंच गए। बुधवार को वह मुख्य न्यायिक मजिस्ट्रेट की अदालत में पेश होंगे। इस मामले से जुडे़ दोनों पक्ष की जिरह नौ जनवरी को पूरी हो गई थी, जिसके बाद मजिस्ट्रेट दलपत सिंह राजपुरोहित ने सलमान को अदालत में मौजूद रहने का निर्देश दिया था। जज ने अपने फैसले को 18 जनवरी तक के लिए सुरक्षित रख लिया था। सलमान इससे पहले बीते साल 10 मार्च को अपना बयान दर्ज कराने के लिए कोर्ट में उपस्थित हुए थे। उन्होंने खुद को निर्दोष बताया था। सलमान ने कहा था कि वन विभाग उन्हें इस मामले में फंसा रहा है।

सभी कॉमेंट्स देखैं

क्या है मामला?
सलमान के खिलाफ जोधपुर जिले के लूणी थाना क्षेत्न के कांकाणी गांव की सरहद में एक और दो अक्टूबर 1998 की रात में दो काले हिरणों का शिकार का और आर्म्स ऐक्ट के तहत दर्ज मामला विचाराधीन है। सलमान पर एक्सपायर हो चुके लाइसेंस के साथ हथियार रखने और इस्तेमाल करने के आरोप में आर्म्स ऐक्ट में मुकदमा दर्ज किया गया था। सलमान यहां अपनी फिल्म 'हम साथ साथ हैं' की शूटिंग के लिए आए थे। वह दो बार जोधपुर जेल में बंद हो चुके हैं। एक बार अप्रैल 2006 में जबकि दूसरी बार अगस्त 2007 में।

क्या रहीं दोनों पक्ष की दलीलें
अभियोजन पक्ष के वकील भवानी सिंह भाटी ने कोर्ट में कहा कि सलमान के पास दो हथियार थे। एक .22 बोर की राइफल और एक .32 बोर की रिवॉल्वर। अभियोजन के मुताबिक, इस्तेमाल करने के बाद सलमान ने इन्हें मुंबई भेज दिया था। भाटी के मुताबिक, दो चश्मदीद गवाहों छोगाराम और शेराराम ने सलमान को इन हथियारों से शिकार करते देखा था।

वहीं, सलमान के वकील एचएम सारस्वत ने कहा, 'हमने कोर्ट में दलील दी कि इस बात के कोई सबूत नहीं हैं कि सलमान ने पास हथियार थे। न तो यहां रहने के दौरान और न ही कथित शिकार के वक्त। उनके पास से जो बरामद किया गया, वो असल में एयर गन्स थे।' बचाव पक्ष ने तत्कालीन मजिस्ट्रेट रजत कुमार मिश्रा द्वारा सलमान के खिलाफ आर्म्स ऐक्ट में मामला चलाने की इजाजत देने को गैरकानूनी ठहराया था।

Dollar Drops on Trump Comments as May Boosts Pound: Markets Wrap

Politics dominated global markets as the dollar weakened after the president-elect called the U.S. currency “too strong” and the pound rallied on British Prime Minister Theresa May’s plans to leave the European Union. Bonds advanced with gold.

The greenback fell against most peers after Donald Trump told the Wall Street Journal its value is too high in part because China holds down its own currency. Sterling posted its biggest rally against the dollar since the global financial crisis and the Bloomberg Commodity Index rose to the highest since July. U.S. stocks retreated, while European shares pared losses.
“The dollar is the guiding light at this point, and all eyes are on the shape U.S. policy will take,” said Fredrik Nerbrand, global head of asset allocation at HSBC Holdings Plc in London. “I would put today’s dollar weakness down to noise rather than a structural shift. If Trump wants to become as growth-generative as he’s planning to be and you don’t have the same fiscal push coming from the rest of the world, then it’s a question of where does the capital flow to. The dollar is the tallest pygmy.”
There’s no end in sight to the impact of Brexit and Trump, twin themes which have dominated markets this year and last. Traders are puzzling over the meaning of the president-elect’s comment ahead of his inauguration Friday, while May’s confirmation that parliament will get a vote on the final Brexit deal added to the pound’s momentumagainst the greenback.
Currencies
  • The Bloomberg Dollar Spot Index retreated 1.3 percent as of 4 p.m. in New York to the lowest in a month. 
  • The pound surged 2.9 percent to $1.2403.
  • The yen traded at 112.68 per dollar, up 1.4 percent. The currency has strengthened 3.7 percent over seven sessions.
Stocks
  • The S&P 500 Index slid 0.3 percent, led by financial and industrial companies.
  • The Stoxx Europe 600 index dropped 0.2 percent after clawing back losses of as much as 0.7 percent.
Bonds
  • The yield on 10-year Treasuries dropped eight basis points to 2.32 percent, after falling two basis points last week. The securities were shut worldwide on Monday for Martin Luther King Day.
  • European bonds rose, with the 10-year bund yield at 0.3 percent.
Commodities
  • Gold extended its winning streak to seven days, the longest since November.
  • Crude oil added 11 cents to $52.48 a barrel in New York.
  • Bloomberg’s commodity index rose for a fifth day.

Trump just signaled the death of Clinton-era strong dollar policy

President-elect Donald Trump's shock comment that the dollar is too strong suggests the U.S. is about to declare as dead a two-decade policy of publicly favoring a strong currency.

"There's no question that the Trump administration would not want a strong dollar. A strong dollar does nothing good for whatever Trump is basically trying to do," said David Woo, Bank of America Merrill Lynch's head of global rates and foreign exchange research. "Yes, the U.S. fundamental story is bullish for the U.S. dollar, but the problem here is they actually don't want a strong dollar. I think it's going to go up. However, it's going to be a much more volatile climb."
Trump's remarks also took a shot at one of the most crowded trades on the planet — long wagers on the dollar. That trade has been a bet that Trump's policies will reflate the economy, causing interest rates and the greenback to rise. But that dollar move is at odds with building a more powerful American manufacturing base, because a strong dollar makes exports more expensive for foreign buyers.
The dollar also threatens the economic health of emerging-market nations, as the cost of everything there rises, including servicing their dollar-denominated debt.
"This is the first time we have a president-elect say the dollar has gone too far. He's saying things and doing things that no president has ever done before."-Marc Chandler, chief foreign exchange strategist, Brown Brothers Harriman
The dollar index gained as much as 6 percent after the election but began retreating in early January and is now up only about 3 percent since Nov. 8. The dollar index was down about 0.7 percent Tuesday on Trump's comment and on pressure from the pound and euro. British sterling rose about 2.7 percent after Prime Minister Theresa May laid out the government's plans for negotiating its exit from the European Union and said Parliament would have to vote on the deal. The euro also rose. 
Trump made his comment in an interview in The Wall Street Journal, where he said the so-called border-adjustment tax proposed by Congress is too complicated to enact. That tax is part of a proposed corporate tax overhaul and would tax imported goods at the border at a proposed 20 percent. Some economists say the dollar could rise sharply in response, by as much as 25 percent.
"This is the first time we have a president-elect say the dollar has gone too far," said Marc Chandler, chief foreign exchange strategist at Brown Brothers Harriman. "He's saying things and doing things that no president has ever done before."
Presidents in recent history have refrained from talking the currency up or down, and Chandler says going back to Clinton Treasury Secretary Robert Rubin, the policy has been for a strong dollar. Even when the dollar's strength created headwinds, administrations have stood by it, at least verbally.
Trump said the dollar was already "too strong," and he pointed a finger at the Chinese currency. "Our companies can't compete with them now because our currency is too strong. And it's killing us," he told the newspaper. Trump said the yuan has been "dropping like a rock," and that recent Chinese moves to support its currency were done "because they don't want us to get angry."
Chandler said the yuan is at a two-month high. It's the fourth week in a row that the dollar has fallen against the yuan. He said the dollar was down 0.75 percent Tuesday against the yuan, which stood at 6.8491 per dollar. 
"It raises questions. Are we back to Lloyd Bentsen? He talked the dollar down and the dollar collapsed. Is this a jettison of the Rubin strong dollar policy? We don't know," said Chandler.
Treasury Secretary Jack Lew, in office for just a few more days, was asked on CNBC about Trump's strong dollar comment.
"I think what we've seen over the last couple of years is a U.S. economy that has been on a relative basis stronger than other countries around the world. That has naturally led to a stronger dollar," said Lew.
Events over the weekend and on Tuesday make the confirmation hearing of Trump's nominee for Treasury secretary, Steven Mnuchin, all the more interesting on Thursday.
Woo said he does not expect Mnuchin to tout the strong dollar policy. Instead, he expects him to stop short of it as he did in a recent CNBC interview by more or less saying a strong "economy" is in the best interest of the U.S. That is very like the comment made by Lew on Tuesday.
"I think they're now actually intervening to protect their currency, not drive it down."-Treasury Secretary Jack Lew, on the Chinese yuan
Lew also said China has made positive strides. "We pushed them to refrain from doing anything on their currency that would lead people to think they're manipulating," he said. "I think they're now actually intervening to protect their currency, not drive it down."
Robert Sinche, chief global strategist at Amherst Pierpont, said in a note that Trump's comment seems to have been aimed at China, but it has been taken more generally about the value of the greenback. In a note, Sinche said there appear to be differences among incoming advisors in the Trump administration, but it's "probably safe to say that reiteration of the "strong USD policy" is unlikely to be a regular comment by US officials in the years ahead."
Trump's comments, made Friday, came four days ahead of President Xi Jingping's speech at the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland, where he discussed globalization and warned against protectionism on Tuesday. Xi is the first Chinese president to speak at Davos, which acts as a conclave for globalists from all over the world.
"Pursuing protectionism is like locking yourself in a dark room, which would seem to escape the wind and rain, but also block out the sunshine and air," Xi said. "Waging a trade war will only cause injury and loss to both sides."
"We don't know how much credence to give it. Some people take him literally. Should people take him literally? The Chinese don't know."-Marc Chandler, chief foreign exchange strategist, Brown Brothers Harriman
Woo said Xi also sounded conciliatory and noted that he recognized the problems globalization brings.
"He said we have to address the consequences that globalization has [brought with regard to] inequality. That shows he understands the political constraints Trump is facing," he said.
Woo said both sides appear willing to talk. But he said ultimately the U.S. and China could be at odds, if Trump's policies succeed in driving up U.S. growth, and the U.S. dollar. That would elevate tensions about the currencies and could mean the U.S. would at that point call China a manipulator.
Markets have been wrestling with how much to believe the protectionist rhetoric from Trump and some members of the incoming administration. Trump has said he wants to impose tariffs, and specifically he has repeatedly targeted cars produced outside the U.S. by both U.S. and foreign automakers.
Trump also predicted in an interview over the weekend that other countries besides Britain will leave the European Union, which he described as an instrument for Germany. He also again called NATO obsolete, though he added that it is important.
"We don't know how much credence to give it. Some people take him literally. Should people take him literally? The Chinese don't know," said Chandler. He said the U.S. has embraced free trade policies since the early 20th century, and NATO was founded after World War II to protect Europe against the threat of the Soviet Union.
Chandler said there are other questions raised by Trump's comments, which are at odds with a number of his appointees. "It also begs the question of where is power going to be. My sense is power is going to be in the White House, not in the Cabinet," he said.
Correction: This story was revised to correct the spelling of Pierpont and Lloyd Bentsen